| | 23 | === SKOS Mapping === |
| | 24 | The [http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/mapping/spec/ SKOS Mapping Vocabulary] defines mappings between topic maps. However, their scheme is not semantically equivalent to our alignment concept, since they use a set theory based approach on the documents attached to their concepts. Thus, the transformation of a SKOS mapping into a PhaseLibs alignment or vice versa is semantically questionable. |
| | 25 | |
| | 26 | In order to transform a set of simple (one-to-many) SKOS mappings you can do the following: |
| | 27 | * the various degrees of matches can be mapped to the confidence property |
| | 28 | * flat AND bag constructs can be transformed to refer instead to an artificial subclasse of the given class conjunction. |
| | 29 | * flat OR bag constructs can be expressed by a number of Superordination/Subsumption relations. |
| | 30 | * NOT constructs can be expressed by a number of Distinctions. |